Editorial standards

Methodology

The site is openly opinionated, but each published entry should be grounded in evidence readers can inspect.

Publication standard

A claim should include the exact statement, date, setting, sufficient context, and at least one primary source whenever one is available.

Preferred evidence

Full video or official livestream
Official transcript
Original social media post
Government or campaign material
Reputable reporting containing the exact quotation
Independent fact checking or analysis

What is rejected

Fabricated quotations, memes presented as evidence, edited clips that alter meaning, anonymous screenshots, rumors, and claims that cannot be responsibly sourced.

Opinion and fact

The editorial judgment belongs to the site. Quotations, dates, context, and factual explanations should be presented separately and sourced clearly.

Corrections

Material changes are logged. Published entries may be clarified, corrected, archived, or withdrawn, but significant changes should not be hidden.